Skip to content
Conference Evaluation
Orlando Orthopaedic Center
2026-07-31T11:04:05-04:00
PRESENTED BY:
X/Twitter
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Program Evaluation and Participant Assessment
Name
*
First
Last
Email
*
Choose Your Profession
*
Select
MD
DO
PA
ATC
PT
PTA
RN
LPN
OT
OTA
DC
MA
Student
Other
Enter Your Profession
License Number (ATs Enter BOC Number)
*
How would you rate this course overall?
*
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Please rate the following components of this program:
Registration process
*
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Delivery Method
*
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Program Faculty
*
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Was the following speakers knowledgeable, relevant and effective regarding the content of their presentation?
Session 1 Speakers
Knowledgeable
*
Yes
No
Relevant
*
Yes
No
Effective
*
Yes
No
Session 2 Speakers
Knowledgeable
*
Yes
No
Relevant
*
Yes
No
Effective
*
Yes
No
Session 3 Speakers
Knowledgeable
*
Yes
No
Relevant
*
Yes
No
Effective
*
Yes
No
Session 4 Speakers
Knowledgeable
*
Yes
No
Relevant
*
Yes
No
Effective
*
Yes
No
Upon completion of the program, are you able to:
1. Discuss and identify clinical indications for surgical intervention in patients with chronic lateral tennis elbow.
*
W. Clark Davenport, MD
Yes
No
Partially
2. Identify the key clinical features of non-tendinous causes of lateral elbow pain, including radial tunnel syndrome and synovial plica syndrome.
*
Michael D. Riggenbach, MD
Yes
No
Partially
3. Differentiate modern rehabilitation strategies based on acute, chronic and refractory presentations of lateral elbow pain.
*
Elizabeth C. Blackburn, MOT/L, CHT, CMOT, CWT
Yes
No
Partially
4. Analyze emerging AI technologies and their impact on rehabilitation delivery, clinical workflow, patient outcomes and the future role of rehabilitation professionals.
*
William J. Hanney, PT, DPT, PhD, ATC, CSCS, FNSCA
Yes
No
Partially
5. Identify patient-specific factors that influence treatment selection and outcomes in individuals with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis who decline surgical management.
*
Travis B. Van Dyke, MD
Yes
No
Partially
6. Differentiate routine primary knee replacement cases from complex arthroplasty presentations that may require specialized surgical techniques, implants or rehabilitation approaches.
*
Ryan A. Davis, MD
Yes
No
Partially
7. Identify common congenital and acquired upper extremity deformities in the pediatric population that may require surgical corrections.
*
Jason B. Malone, DO
Yes
No
Partially
8. Compare and contrast current limb lengthening technologies, including external fixation and internal motorized lengthening devices, with respect to surgical principles, benefits, limitations and potential complications.
*
Daniel K. Ruggles, DO
Yes
No
Partially
9. Identify common pediatric lower extremity deformities, including angular rotational and limb length abnormalities, that may require surgical intervention.
*
Shawn C. Standard, MD
Yes
No
Partially
10. Identify common postoperative considerations and complications with limb lengthening and reconstruction procedures, including joint stiffness, pain, neurovascular concerns, infection and delayed functional progression.
*
Nicole A. Toro-Keister, PA-C
Yes
No
Partially
11. Apply evidence-based rehabilitation interventions to address mobility limitations, optimize gait mechanics and improve functional performance following deformity correction procedures.
*
Emilea L. Allen, PT, DPT, PCS
Yes
No
Partially
12. Analyze challenging orthopaedic walk-in clinic cases using patient history, physical examination findings and diagnostic imaging results.
*
Andrew J. Beverly, PA-C
Yes
No
Partially
13. Describe clinic findings associated with chronic or recurrent lateral ankle sprains and their impact on functional outcomes.
*
Darshan K. Ghayal, PT, DPT, SCS, CSCS, ACSM-EP
Yes
No
Partially
14. Develop individualized rehabilitation and return to work plans based on symptom response, functional testing and work-specific demands.
*
Mallory T. Behenna, PT, DPT
Yes
No
Partially
If you answered No to any of the categories above, please explain:
*
Please rate the projected impact of this activity on your competence, performance, and patient outcomes:
The program met my expectations.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The program faculty style was appropriate for the material.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The program faculty was responsive to questions/comments.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This program has utilized the best available evidence to support its objectives?
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Level of difficulty was appropriate (went beyond entry‐level)?
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The program met my objectives.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The information received was useful and beneficial.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The information will lead me to make changes in my clinical practice.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This activity increased my competence (i.e., ability to apply knowledge, skills and judgment in practice).
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This activity will improve my performance.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This activity will improve my patient outcomes.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
How will you change your practice as a result of this activity?
*
What barriers, besides time and/or money, do you anticipate encountering as you make changes in your practice?
*
What percentage of information presented in this program will be of use to you?
*
Did you feel that there was commercial bias or influence in this activity?
*
Yes
No
If yes, please explain:
*
How many OOC Foundation Conferences have you attended?
*
1st
2-5
6-10
11-15
16+
What topics would you like to see at future OOC Foundation conferences?
*
What did you like about this OOC Foundation program/speaker?
*
What did you dislike about this OOC Foundation program/speakers?
*
General Comments:
Orlando Orthopaedic Center Foundation is approved by the Board of Certification, Inc. to offer continuing education. BOC Approved Provider Number: P3239
Page load link
